Brazilian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,793,446 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $38,120, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $88,115, a difference of 18.5%), and median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $48,254, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $56,339, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.8%), single female poverty (20.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.97%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (46.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.6%).