Apache vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,446,120 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.316% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 316.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.8%), per capita income ($34,886 compared to $38,120, a difference of 9.3%), and median family income ($84,451 compared to $91,296, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $49,364, a difference of 0.060%), median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $35,498, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $56,339, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 79.9%), receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.6%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 17.1%), single female poverty (27.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 88.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 85.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 43.7%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.58%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 22.9%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and associate's degree (36.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 79.8%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.5%).