Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,667,404 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 43.3%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $35,498, a difference of 15.4%), and per capita income ($41,655 compared to $38,120, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $56,339, a difference of 1.8%), median family income ($94,466 compared to $91,296, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $88,115, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 46.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 31.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.62%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 129.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 64.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 17.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 54.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.4%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.0%).