Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ukraine
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ukraine

Hmong

Good
Average
6,807
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
142nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Ukraine Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,368,592 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Ukraine communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.930. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ukraine within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ukraine corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Hmong.
Immigrants from Ukraine Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,134 compared to $38,120, a difference of 26.3%), median male earnings ($59,820 compared to $48,254, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,664 compared to $84,258, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,163 compared to $56,339, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,447 compared to $49,364, a difference of 12.3%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,134
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,645
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,124
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,984
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,820
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,069
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,447
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,664
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,079
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,163
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.2%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Average
9.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.4%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.5%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.2%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.6%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and family households (64.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.2%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.1%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.9%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.2%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.8%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.9%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UkraineHmong
Disability
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.4%