Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Hmong

Fair
Average
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,034,676 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.925. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.033% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 1,033.2 Hmong.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 27.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $84,258, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $49,364, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $35,498, a difference of 3.4%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $38,120, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $42,111, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 104.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.6%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.42%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.7%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and associate's degree (41.8% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoHmong
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%