Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Hmong

Fair
Average
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,450,246 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 16.9 Hmong.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.9%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $38,120, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $88,115, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $49,364, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $56,339, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $42,111, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.40%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 56.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 18.1%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (63.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.17%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandHmong
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%