Cuban vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,290,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 42.9 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $56,339, a difference of 14.6%), and median family income ($84,981 compared to $91,296, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $35,498, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($37,383 compared to $38,120, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $88,115, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 70.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 42.0%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%).