Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs

Hmong

Good
Average
7,301
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
124th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,093,914 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.053% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to a decrease of 53.1 Hmong.
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Integration in Hmong Communities

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $49,364, a difference of 32.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $88,115, a difference of 25.1%), and median household income ($91,991 compared to $75,839, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $35,498, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,108 compared to $56,339, a difference of 13.8%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Income
Income MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,195
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,622
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,991
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,304
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,437
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,159
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$65,329
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,936
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,201
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,108
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 46.2%), single male poverty (9.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.7%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
81.7%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.7%), births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (68.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.8%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.8%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
27.7%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.0%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.0%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 9th grade (94.7% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.8%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacHmong
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.4%