Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Poor
Poor
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,675,831 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 28.8 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $41,709, a difference of 43.7%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $80,722, a difference of 36.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $90,448, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($47,722 compared to $55,394, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $39,910, a difference of 20.8%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
20.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 94.5%), single father poverty (29.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 79.8%), and family poverty (18.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 29.2%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
15.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 64.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and female unemployment (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 10.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
80.7%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 66.7%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (40.1% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Good
30.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 173.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 110.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 78.1%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
3.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 64.1%), bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 60.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.31%), ged/equivalency (81.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 11th grade (90.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.55%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Average
1.8%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 93.4%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 91.0%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%