Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,707,315 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.164% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 164.1 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 25.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $55,394, a difference of 18.9%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $94,665, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,910, a difference of 2.2%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,532, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,714, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 83.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 67.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.49%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 39.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.4%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 184.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 65.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 47.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 82.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 38.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.030%), disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.3%).