Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Good
Poor
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,019,855 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 108.3 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $55,394, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $92,208, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $39,910, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,714, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $45,532, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
20.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 41.6%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.5%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
15.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
80.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.35%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Good
30.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 134.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 55.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 50.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Tragic
3.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 50.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%