Pima vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
New Zealanders
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,694,919 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 16.8 New Zealanders.
Pima vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,575, a difference of 65.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,286, a difference of 51.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $95,146, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,446, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $105,085, a difference of 26.9%).
Income Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.7% |
Pima vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 156.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 127.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 32.7%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Pima vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 161.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 120.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Good 5.3% |
Pima vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Fair 82.6% |
Pima vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 99.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 69.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 30.3% |
Pima vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 6.5% |
Pima vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 97.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 89.9%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Pima vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.9%).
Disability Metric | Pima | New Zealander |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |