Pima vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,627,556 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 102.7 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,306, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $70,208, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $45,758, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,204, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $80,319, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 43.8%), single male poverty (20.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 74.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 140.9%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 122.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 111.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 25.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 56.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 111.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), high school diploma (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and 11th grade (88.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.1%).