Pima vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,456,830 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Apache within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.178% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 178.1 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.3%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $34,886, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $70,927, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,895, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $80,260, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $49,395, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 64.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 56.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 77.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 21.8%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 91.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.88%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.3%).