Pima vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,385,528 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 32.5 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,072, a difference of 21.0%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,660, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,062, a difference of 0.92%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,677, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $48,720, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 86.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 82.5%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.3%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 89.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 78.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 45.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 27.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.48%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.0%).