Pima vs Belgian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,498,484 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Belgians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 13.2 Belgians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,951, a difference of 43.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $100,060, a difference of 36.4%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,113, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,382, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $94,262, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 169.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 131.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 116.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 171.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 137.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 62.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 76.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 59.6%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.8%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.7%).