Pima vs Pakistani Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,860,826 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 25.1 Pakistanis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,587, a difference of 48.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,317, a difference of 43.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,638, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,325, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,596, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $98,401, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 141.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 120.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 102.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 154.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 124.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 81.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 68.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 71.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 70.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 66.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.1%).