Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Congo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Congo
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,814,905 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Congo.
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $43,266, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,720, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $72,178, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,393, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,169, a difference of 2.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $35,720 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $82,216 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $66,768 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $39,169 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $44,204 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $34,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $43,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $72,178 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $77,850 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $51,393 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 85.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 24.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 23.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 22.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 22.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 33.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 147.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 108.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 12.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 41.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.23, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.77%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 39.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 41.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 36.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.9%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 52.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 44.7%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 38.3%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 61.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 41.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 48.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Congo |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |