Pima vs Ukrainian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Ukrainian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Ukrainians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,528
SOCIAL INDEX
82.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
66th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ukrainian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,287,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 23.6 Ukrainians.
Pima vs Ukrainian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,014, a difference of 56.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $108,475, a difference of 47.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,456, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,843, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,015, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $102,451, a difference of 23.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $48,014 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $111,368 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $91,456 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $50,320 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $59,728 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $42,015 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $53,843 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $102,451 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $108,475 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Excellent $63,032 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.3% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 154.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 103.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 49.4%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Excellent 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 156.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 125.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 96.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 76.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 29.2% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 12.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 10.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Good 55.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Average 19.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 6.3% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 82.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 76.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 67.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 61.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 40.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Pima vs Ukrainian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 72.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Ukrainian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.5% |