Pima vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,114,204 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 21.2 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,785, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $84,925, a difference of 15.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,650, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,530, a difference of 3.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $78,986, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $53,711, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 91.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 110.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 81.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 41.7%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 47.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.78%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).