Pima vs Immigrants from Western Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,883,763 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Western Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 22.7 Immigrants from Western Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,294, a difference of 31.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $92,384, a difference of 25.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $79,490, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,676, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $49,621, a difference of 3.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 97.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 71.6%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.1%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 88.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 55.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 56.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%).