Pima vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,330,756 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 18.0 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $108,643, a difference of 48.1%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $93,076, a difference of 47.1%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $105,967, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,288, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,972, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $45,665, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 140.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 139.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 61.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 183.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 181.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 150.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 81.4%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 5.6%), average family size (3.75 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 97.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 47.7%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 42.4%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.49%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 62.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.4%).