Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,757,470 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 25.3 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,876, a difference of 53.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,217, a difference of 44.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,005, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,190, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,375, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,516, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 97.4%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 39.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 143.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 116.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 102.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 89.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.26, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.7%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 88.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 82.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.1%).