Pima vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,298,556 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 89.5 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $110,201, a difference of 50.2%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,195, a difference of 47.5%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,159, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $101,936, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $48,304, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 151.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 133.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 126.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 62.1%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 78.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 175.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 161.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 127.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 134.3%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.24, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 102.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 71.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 71.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 65.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.7%).