Pima vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,436,154 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 35.6 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $74,217, a difference of 17.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $85,965, a difference of 17.2%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,022, a difference of 0.94%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $80,012, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,762, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 53.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 99.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 58.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 5.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 70.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (76.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (81.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.8%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.2%).