Pima vs Swiss Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Swiss
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Swiss
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swiss Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,760,169 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.155% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 155.2 Swiss.
Pima vs Swiss Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,076, a difference of 43.8%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 41.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,071, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,493, a difference of 0.020%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,904, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,511, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Pima | Swiss |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Good $44,076 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Good $104,396 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Average $85,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Average $46,315 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Good $55,731 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $37,904 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Poor $51,493 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Good $95,511 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Good $103,071 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Good $61,621 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 30.0% |
Pima vs Swiss Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 166.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 138.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 122.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 29.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Swiss |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Pima vs Swiss Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 169.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 137.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Swiss |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Pima vs Swiss Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 12.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Swiss |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 43.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Average 82.8% |
Pima vs Swiss Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 82.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 68.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Swiss |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 30.5% |
Pima vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 80.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Swiss |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 61.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Pima vs Swiss Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 60.4%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Swiss |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Average 59.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Fair 37.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Excellent 2.0% |
Pima vs Swiss Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Swiss |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |