Pima vs Turkish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Turkish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Turks
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Turkish Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,430,298 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.872. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 13.2 Turks.
Pima vs Turkish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,391, a difference of 71.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $117,814, a difference of 60.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $99,389, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,695, a difference of 26.5%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 31.2%).
Income Metric | Pima | Turkish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $121,202 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $53,919 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $64,253 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $44,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $110,318 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $117,814 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $68,037 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.7% |
Pima vs Turkish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 164.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 144.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 122.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 6.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Turkish |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Pima vs Turkish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 175.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 133.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 110.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Turkish |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Pima vs Turkish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 8.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Turkish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Pima vs Turkish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 111.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 87.5%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Turkish |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Pima vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Turkish |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs Turkish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 115.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 102.2%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Turkish |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 70.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Pima vs Turkish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 83.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Turkish |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |