Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Vietnam
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Vietnam

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,880
SOCIAL INDEX
66.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
138th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Vietnam Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,899,211 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 47.8 Immigrants from Vietnam.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Vietnam Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,987, a difference of 45.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,417, a difference of 45.1%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,229, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,562, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,153, a difference of 13.7%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 19.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Fair
$43,229
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Excellent
$106,186
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$91,987
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Good
$47,282
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Good
$54,913
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Good
$40,153
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$55,562
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$100,535
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$106,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Excellent
$63,014
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Good
25.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 115.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 111.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 106.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 44.4%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 58.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
11.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 155.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 124.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 122.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Average
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Excellent
83.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 75.9%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.38, a difference of 10.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 82.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
60.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 60.0%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.5%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
88.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
83.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Poor
64.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Poor
58.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Poor
14.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 67.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Vietnam
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.5%