Pima vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,806,934 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 303.5 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $86,402, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $74,112, a difference of 17.2%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,897, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $81,363, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,960, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 99.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 89.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 156.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 146.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 49.6%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 63.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.77%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.4%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.52%), 10th grade (91.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 43.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.96%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%).