Pima vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,949,156 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 93.6 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,448, a difference of 61.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $112,484, a difference of 53.3%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $115,395, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,552, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,108, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $105,223, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 188.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 155.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 125.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 52.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 131.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 97.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 74.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 6.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 91.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.8%).