Pima vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Comanche
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,329,763 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.932% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 1,931.8 Comanche.
Pima vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $38,088, a difference of 24.3%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $85,787, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,152, a difference of 0.82%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,661, a difference of 0.95%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $47,518, a difference of 8.4%).
Income Metric | Pima | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Pima vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 90.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 86.1%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.8%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 20.3%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Comanche |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Pima vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 125.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 108.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Comanche |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Pima vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 79.2% |
Pima vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Comanche |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Pima vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 37.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Pima vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 37.5%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Pima vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (13.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Comanche |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |