Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Lithuania

Poor
Exceptional
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,083,912 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.954. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 71.5 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $51,361, a difference of 67.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $114,336, a difference of 55.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $96,836, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,028, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,317, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $108,149, a difference of 30.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
28.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 164.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 154.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 127.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 53.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 63.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 121.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 85.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
27.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 99.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 92.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 87.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%