Pima vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,619,018 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.985. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.792% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 791.6 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,163, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,951, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $62,330, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.41%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $88,446, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,905, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 88.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 86.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.5%), single male poverty (20.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 123.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 84.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 32.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 36.5%), currently married (35.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father households (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 3.5%).