Pima vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,765,759 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.192% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 191.8 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $53,806, a difference of 75.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $122,222, a difference of 66.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $104,796, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,123, a difference of 10.9%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $46,502, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 137.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 137.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 125.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 48.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 168.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 144.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 136.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 121.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 105.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.22, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.29%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 125.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 124.7%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 107.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.24%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 90.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 83.8%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.7%).