Pima vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,466,360 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,938, a difference of 53.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $108,471, a difference of 47.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,887, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,729, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,183, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $101,124, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 107.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 94.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 135.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 117.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 101.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 108.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 103.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.30, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 89.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 82.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 76.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 62.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.0%).