Pima vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Serbians

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,777,289 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 174.2 Serbians.
Pima Integration in Serbian Communities

Pima vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,551, a difference of 51.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,522, a difference of 41.1%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $87,572, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,106, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,539, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $98,320, a difference of 18.7%).
Pima vs Serbian Income
Income MetricPimaSerbian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.7%

Pima vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 165.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 130.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 114.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 35.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.4%).
Pima vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaSerbian
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Pima vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 164.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 128.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 115.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%).
Pima vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaSerbian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Pima vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 13.6%).
Pima vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Pima vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 67.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Pima vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaSerbian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Good
30.7%

Pima vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.5%).
Pima vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
6.0%

Pima vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 73.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 72.9%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Pima vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
2.0%

Pima vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 73.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.5%).
Pima vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricPimaSerbian
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%