Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Austria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Austria

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,557
SOCIAL INDEX
83.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
65th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Austria Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,500,669 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Austria.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Austria Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,503, a difference of 71.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $113,140, a difference of 54.2%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $116,830, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,400, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,824, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $106,103, a difference of 28.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$52,503
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$116,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$95,277
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$51,826
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$62,164
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$42,824
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Good
$52,400
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$106,103
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$113,140
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$68,208
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
28.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 154.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 140.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 110.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 44.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 158.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 115.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Good
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
82.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 105.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 79.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
25.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
6.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 103.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 90.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 85.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
70.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
64.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
52.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
44.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 81.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Austria Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Austria
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.4%