Pima vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,485,526 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 26.0 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $59,066, a difference of 92.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $134,910, a difference of 83.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $115,509, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,740, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $49,508, a difference of 40.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 182.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 176.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 167.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 58.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 190.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 149.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 146.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 131.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 124.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 76.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.20, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 160.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 153.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 103.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 100.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 22.9%).