Pima vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,674,422 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,811, a difference of 23.8%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,166, a difference of 23.6%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,407, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,783, a difference of 0.54%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,629, a difference of 0.86%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,066, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 77.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.4%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 125.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 44.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (88.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.86%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 47.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%).