Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Netherlands
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Netherlands

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,231
SOCIAL INDEX
89.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
26th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Netherlands Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,986,768 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Netherlands. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Immigrants from Netherlands.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Netherlands Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,458, a difference of 64.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,982, a difference of 52.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $94,411, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,592, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,870, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $105,082, a difference of 26.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$50,458
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$114,987
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$94,411
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$50,818
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$61,096
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$41,870
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Good
$52,592
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$105,082
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$111,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$66,463
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
28.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 162.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 137.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 38.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
82.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 93.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 72.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.58%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 5.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 95.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 88.1%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 86.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
70.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Netherlands Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Netherlands
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%