Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,803,668 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 34.6 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,709, a difference of 36.1%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,722, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $92,208, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,714, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $90,448, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 71.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.2%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 113.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 101.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 66.6%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.36, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 101.8%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 82.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 67.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 63.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 11th grade (88.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 63.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 16.2%).