Pima vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,627,026 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 16.8 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,406, a difference of 38.4%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $79,664, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,266, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,202, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $54,163, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $89,565, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 81.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 71.1%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 117.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 105.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 93.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.29, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 101.4%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 84.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 16.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 75.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 55.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 59.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.6%).