Pima vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Creek
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,953,627 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Creek.
Pima vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 28.5%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,546, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,949, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,648, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $33,437, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 106.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 84.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.2%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 13.3%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 119.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Creek |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 77.7% |
Pima vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Creek |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 37.6% |
Pima vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.58%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Pima vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Pima vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%), ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |