Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Taiwan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Taiwan

Poor
Exceptional
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,553
SOCIAL INDEX
93.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
13th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Taiwan Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,848,565 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.645. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 29.4 Immigrants from Taiwan.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Taiwan Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $57,742, a difference of 88.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $135,508, a difference of 84.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $116,460, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $59,424, a difference of 15.4%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $49,256, a difference of 39.4%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 39.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$57,742
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$136,949
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$116,460
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$61,151
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$74,031
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$49,256
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$59,424
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$129,122
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$135,508
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$77,051
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
29.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 177.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 176.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 169.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 61.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 64.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.9%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
23.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
7.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 192.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 157.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 150.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
71.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 127.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 123.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.24, a difference of 15.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
68.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
52.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
50.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
23.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 83.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.42%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
59.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
22.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 142.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 142.5%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
74.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
69.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
58.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
51.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
22.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
3.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 105.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 105.6%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 22.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Taiwan Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Taiwan
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%