Pima vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,795,312 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,459, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,611, a difference of 45.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,605, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,757, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,900, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 130.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 117.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 98.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 167.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 118.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 114.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 88.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 67.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 83.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 77.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%).