Pima vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,836,978 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.477% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 477.2 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $51,731, a difference of 68.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $114,342, a difference of 55.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $96,324, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,571, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $45,014, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 153.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 167.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 150.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 142.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 111.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 92.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.3%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 116.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 103.6%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 77.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%).