Pima vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,251,151 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.086% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 86.4 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,950, a difference of 66.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,984, a difference of 52.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $95,032, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,022, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,523, a difference of 23.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $64,828, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 146.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 107.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 156.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 122.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 106.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 81.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 97.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 87.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 78.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%).