Pima vs Scottish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Scottish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Scottish
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Scottish Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,423,278 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Scottish.
Pima vs Scottish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,440, a difference of 45.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $102,123, a difference of 39.2%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,554, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,397, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $94,622, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Pima | Scottish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Good $44,440 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Good $104,288 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Average $85,101 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Average $46,463 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Good $55,793 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $38,397 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $50,554 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Average $94,622 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Good $102,123 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Good $61,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 29.1% |
Pima vs Scottish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 167.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 131.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 36.2%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Scottish |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Pima vs Scottish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 163.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 101.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Scottish |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Pima vs Scottish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 12.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Scottish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 63.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 42.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 82.2% |
Pima vs Scottish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 81.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 62.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Scottish |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Average 31.7% |
Pima vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 108.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Scottish |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 61.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Pima vs Scottish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 64.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 64.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Scottish |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 67.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Excellent 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Good 46.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Average 38.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Excellent 2.0% |
Pima vs Scottish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 63.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.2%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.060%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Scottish |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.5% |