Pima vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Choctaw
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,682,137 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 22.4 Choctaw.
Pima vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 33.3%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,999, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,450, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $33,775, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $53,060, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $40,270, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 28.1% |
Pima vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 90.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 81.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.0%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 16.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Pima vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 98.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 90.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Pima vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 78.2% |
Pima vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 39.6%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 36.9% |
Pima vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 79.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Pima vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 26.8%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.0% |