Pima vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,441,027 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.402% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 402.4 Tsimshian.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $96,783, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,346, a difference of 31.8%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,344, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,649, a difference of 6.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,530, a difference of 11.9%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (28.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 146.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (29.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.3%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 108.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 103.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 91.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.5%), male unemployment (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.5%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.7%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and college, 1 year or more (45.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 127.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.7%).